On 2022/11/14 20:51, Yi Liu wrote: > On 2022/11/10 00:57, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 11:18:03PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote: >>> On 2022/11/8 17:19, Nicolin Chen wrote: >>>> On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 08:52:44PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >>>> >>>>> This is on github: >>>>> https://github.com/jgunthorpe/linux/commits/vfio_iommufd >>>> [...] >>>>> v2: >>>>> - Rebase to v6.1-rc3, v4 iommufd series >>>>> - Fixup comments and commit messages from list remarks >>>>> - Fix leaking of the iommufd for mdevs >>>>> - New patch to fix vfio modaliases when vfio container is disabled >>>>> - Add a dmesg once when the iommufd provided /dev/vfio/vfio is opened >>>>> to signal that iommufd is providing this >>>> >>>> I've redone my previous sanity tests. Except those reported bugs, >>>> things look fine. Once we fix those issues, GVT and other modules >>>> can run some more stressful tests, I think. >>> >>> our side is also starting test (gvt, nic passthrough) this version. >>> need to wait a while for the result. >> >> I've updated the branches with the two functional fixes discussed on >> the list plus all the doc updates. >> > > I see, due to timzone, the kernel we grabbed is 37c9e6e44d77a, it has > slight diff in the scripts/kernel-doc compared with the latest commit > (6bb16a9c67769). I don't think it impacts the test. > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgg/iommufd.git/log/?h=for-next > (37c9e6e44d77a) > > Our side, Yu He, Lixiao Yang has done below tests on Intel platform > with the above kernel, results are: > > 1) GVT-g test suit passed, Intel iGFx passthrough passed. > > 2) NIC passthrough test with different guest memory (1G/4G), passed. > > 3) Booting two different QEMUs in the same time but one QEMU opens > legacy /dev/vfio/vfio and another opens /dev/iommu. Tests passed. > > 4) Tried below Kconfig combinations, results are expected. > > VFIO_CONTAINER=y, IOMMUFD=y -- test pass > VFIO_CONTAINER=y, IOMMUFD=n -- test pass > VFIO_CONTAINER=n, IOMMUFD=y , IOMMUFD_VFIO_CONTAINER=y -- test pass > VFIO_CONTAINER=n, IOMMUFD=y , IOMMUFD_VFIO_CONTAINER=n -- no > /dev/vfio/vfio, so test fail, expected > > 5) Tested devices from multi-device group. Assign such devices to the > same VM, pass; assign them to different VMs, fail; assign them to a VM > with Intel virtual VT-d, fail; Results are expected. > > Meanwhile, I also tested the branch in development branch for nesting, > the basic functionality looks good. > > Tested-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Lixiao Yang <lixiao.yang@xxxxxxxxx> -- Regards, Lixiao Yang
