On 11/7/22 08:26, Like Xu wrote:
On 15/10/2022 12:18 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022, Like Xu wrote:
On 8/10/2022 3:38 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
Does this need Cc:stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx? Or is this benign enough
that we don't
care?
Considering stable kernel may access IA32_OVERCLOCKING_STATUS as well,
cc stable list helps to remove the illusion of pmu msr scope for
stable tree
maintainers.
Is that a "yes, this should be Cc'd stable" or "no, don't bother"?
Oops, I missed this one. "Yes, this should be Cc'd" as I have received a
few complaints on this.
Please let me know if I need to post a new version of this minor patch
set, considering the previous
comment "No need for a v4, the above nits can be handled when applying. "
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
