On Thu, Sep 01, 2022, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > There was actually a patch series that was fixing it, but you said, just like me, > that it is not worth it, better to have an errata in KVM, since guest should not use > this info anyway. I didn't object to it, and neither I do now, but as you see, > you also sometimes agree that going 100% to the spec is not worth it. > > > I hope you understand me. Yep. And rereading what I wrote... I didn't intend to imply that you personally aren't operating in "good faith" or whatever is the right terminology. What I was trying to explain is why I sometimes speak in absolutes. When there is a bug/regression and KVM is clearly violating spec, it's not a matter of opinion; KVM is broken and needs to be fixed. Of course, one could argue that that's an opinion in and of itself...
