[PATCH v6 14/33] KVM: nVMX: WARN once and fail VM-Enter if eVMCS sees VMFUNC[63:32] != 0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>

WARN and reject nested VM-Enter if KVM is using eVMCS and manages to
allow a non-zero value in the upper 32 bits of VM-function controls.  The
eVMCS code assumes all inputs are 32-bit values and subtly drops the
upper bits.  WARN instead of adding proper "support", it's unlikely the
upper bits will be defined/used in the next decade.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
index c3a5309f6e82..b64e29f1359f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
@@ -469,6 +469,14 @@ int nested_evmcs_check_controls(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
 					       vmcs12->vm_entry_controls)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/*
+	 * VM-Func controls are 64-bit, but KVM currently doesn't support any
+	 * controls in bits 63:32, i.e. dropping those bits on the consistency
+	 * check is intentional.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(vmcs12->vm_function_control >> 32))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	if (CC(!nested_evmcs_is_valid_controls(EVMCS_VMFUNC,
 					       vmcs12->vm_function_control)))
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.37.2




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux