On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:14:47 +0200 Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/25/2010 10:40 PM, Izik Eidus wrote: > > > >> Or is this a feature you need? > >> > > > > I dont need it (I asked Avi to do something), So he said he want to nuke the aliasing > > from kvm and keep supporting the old userspace`s > > > > Do you have any other way to achive this? > > > > Btw I do realize it might be better not to push this patch and just keep the old > > way of treating aliasing as we have now, I really don`t mind. > > > > How about implementing an alias pointing at a deleted slot as an invalid > slot? > > If the slot comes back later, we can revalidate it. > Ok, didn`t notice this invalid memslot flag, I will add this, I will still leave the update_aliased_memslot() in order to update the userspace virtual address... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
