Re: KVM call agenda for Jan 26

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/26/2010 04:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/26/2010 08:15 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/26/2010 04:13 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Me too, especially as the whole stack is involved, and qemu is the topmost part from our perspective (no doubt libvirt will want to integrate that functionality as well).


I'm not sure I agree. It would use no code from qemu and really benefit in no way from being part of qemu. I don't feel that strongly about it though.


It would need to know which cpuid bits qemu supports. Only qemu knows that.

I'm not sure I understand why.  Can you elaborate?


If qemu doesn't recognize -cpu qemu64,+nx, then no amount of hardware and kvm.ko support will allow the user to enable nx in a guest.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux