On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:12:36PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 01/25/2010 01:11 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:08:13PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > >>On 01/25/2010 12:01 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >>>On HW task switch newly loaded segments should me marked as accessed. > >>> > >>>@@ -4775,6 +4766,11 @@ int kvm_load_segment_descriptor(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 selector, > >>> kvm_seg.unusable = 1; > >>> > >>> kvm_set_segment(vcpu,&kvm_seg, seg); > >>>+ if (selector&& !kvm_seg.unusable&& kvm_seg.s) { > >>>+ /* mark segment as accessed */ > >>>+ seg_desc.type |= 1; > >>>+ save_guest_segment_descriptor(vcpu, selector,&seg_desc); > >>>+ } > >>> return 0; > >>> } > >>What about an error return from s_g_s_d? > >> > >What can or should we do about it? > > > > If -EFAULT, propagate to userspace. > We don't handle it anywhere in task switch emulation. Separate patch? -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html