On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 6:30 PM Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 11:09:04PM +0000, Ben Gardon wrote:
> > When disabling dirty logging, zap non-leaf parent entries to allow
> > replacement with huge pages instead of recursing and zapping all of the
> > child, leaf entries. This reduces the number of TLB flushes required.
> >
> > Currently disabling dirty logging with the TDP MMU is extremely slow.
> > On a 96 vCPU / 96G VM backed with gigabyte pages, it takes ~200 seconds
> > to disable dirty logging with the TDP MMU, as opposed to ~4 seconds with
> > the shadow MMU. This patch reduces the disable dirty log time with the
> > TDP MMU to ~3 seconds.
> >
> > Testing:
> > Ran KVM selftests and kvm-unit-tests on an Intel Haswell. This
> > patch introduced no new failures.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c | 9 +++++++++
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h | 1 +
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c
> > index 6d3b3e5a5533..ee4802d7b36c 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c
> > @@ -145,6 +145,15 @@ static bool try_step_up(struct tdp_iter *iter)
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Step the iterator back up a level in the paging structure. Should only be
> > + * used when the iterator is below the root level.
> > + */
> > +void tdp_iter_step_up(struct tdp_iter *iter)
> > +{
> > + WARN_ON(!try_step_up(iter));
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Step to the next SPTE in a pre-order traversal of the paging structure.
> > * To get to the next SPTE, the iterator either steps down towards the goal
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
> > index f0af385c56e0..adfca0cf94d3 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
> > @@ -114,5 +114,6 @@ void tdp_iter_start(struct tdp_iter *iter, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
> > int min_level, gfn_t next_last_level_gfn);
> > void tdp_iter_next(struct tdp_iter *iter);
> > void tdp_iter_restart(struct tdp_iter *iter);
> > +void tdp_iter_step_up(struct tdp_iter *iter);
> >
> > #endif /* __KVM_X86_MMU_TDP_ITER_H */
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> > index 841feaa48be5..7b9265d67131 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> > @@ -1742,12 +1742,12 @@ static void zap_collapsible_spte_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> > gfn_t start = slot->base_gfn;
> > gfn_t end = start + slot->npages;
> > struct tdp_iter iter;
> > + int max_mapping_level;
> > kvm_pfn_t pfn;
> >
> > rcu_read_lock();
> >
> > tdp_root_for_each_pte(iter, root, start, end) {
> > -retry:
> > if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false, true))
> > continue;
> >
> > @@ -1755,15 +1755,41 @@ static void zap_collapsible_spte_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> > !is_last_spte(iter.old_spte, iter.level))
> > continue;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * This is a leaf SPTE. Check if the PFN it maps can
> > + * be mapped at a higher level.
> > + */
> > pfn = spte_to_pfn(iter.old_spte);
> > - if (kvm_is_reserved_pfn(pfn) ||
> > - iter.level >= kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(kvm, slot, iter.gfn,
> > - pfn, PG_LEVEL_NUM))
> > +
> > + if (kvm_is_reserved_pfn(pfn))
> > continue;
> >
> > + max_mapping_level = kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(kvm, slot,
> > + iter.gfn, pfn, PG_LEVEL_NUM);
> > +
> > + WARN_ON(max_mapping_level < iter.level);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If this page is already mapped at the highest
> > + * viable level, there's nothing more to do.
> > + */
> > + if (max_mapping_level == iter.level)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The page can be remapped at a higher level, so step
> > + * up to zap the parent SPTE.
> > + */
> > + while (max_mapping_level > iter.level)
> > + tdp_iter_step_up(&iter);
>
> So the benefit from this is:
> Before: Zap 512 ptes in 4K level page table do TLB flush 512 times.
> Now: Zap higher level 1 2MB level pte do TLB flush 1 time, event
> it also handles all 512 lower level 4K ptes, but just atomic operation
> there, see handle_removed_pt().
>
> Is my understanding correct ?
Yes, that's exactly right.
>
> > +
> > /* Note, a successful atomic zap also does a remote TLB flush. */
> > - if (tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(kvm, &iter))
> > - goto retry;
> > + tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(kvm, &iter);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If the atomic zap fails, the iter will recurse back into
> > + * the same subtree to retry.
> > + */
> > }
> >
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > --
> > 2.36.1.124.g0e6072fb45-goog
> >
