RE: [PATCH RFC 11/12] iommufd: vfio container FD ioctl compatibility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Jason Gunthorpe
> Sent: Monday, May 9, 2022 10:01 PM
> 
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 04:01:52PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> 
> > Which is why I'm suggesting that the base address be an optional
> > request.  DPDK *will* care about the size of the range, so it just
> > requests that and gets told a base address.
> 
> We've talked about a size of IOVA address space before, strictly as a
> hint, to possible optimize page table layout, or something, and I'm
> fine with that idea. But - we have no driver implementation today, so
> I'm not sure what we can really do with this right now..
> 
> Kevin could Intel consume a hint on IOVA space and optimize the number
> of IO page table levels?
> 

It could, but not implemented now.




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux