On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 01:06:24PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 01/11/2010 01:03 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > >>No, but I'm not really worried about that. > >> > >So you want to introduce something that we know upset Windows without > >looking into alternatives. > > I don't want to drop support for existing guests unless I have to. > Neither do I and I would be happy with what we had if SVVP wouldn't complain. So we need some kind of fix, or exception for the test. > >And as far as I remember upstream position > >on the UNISYS way was negative, did this change? > > I don't see anything fundamentally wrong with the unisys > implementation. True, it's not written to any spec, but neither is > anything we can come up with (unless we find a spec for cpu > hotplug). > -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
