Re: [PATCH 02/10] kvm/vfio: Reduce the scope of PPC #ifdefs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 09:13:43AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 06:47:31AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 03:46:01PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > Use IS_ENABLED and static inlines instead of just ifdef'ing away all the
> > > PPC code. This allows it to be compile tested on all platforms and makes
> > > it easier to maintain.
> > 
> > That's even uglier than what we had.  I'd rather have a new vfio_ppc.c
> > to implement it, then you can stubs for it in the header (or IS_ENABLED
> > if you really want) but we don't need stubs for ppc-specific arch
> > functionality in a consumer of it.
> 
> That seems like a good approach, I will try it

Actually, it defeats the whole point of this patch. I wrote it so I
could compile test all this stuff on x86 - if I shift it into a
vfio_ppc.c and make some kconfig stuff then it still won't compile
test on x86.

At that point I'd rather leave the ifdefs as-is and drop this patch.

Yes, the #ifdef is ugly, but this whole PPC thing is ugly :\

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux