On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 12:54 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, Peter Gonda wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:48 AM Marc Orr <marcorr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:40 AM Marc Orr <marcorr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:11 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > +Paolo and Vitaly > > > > > > > > > > In the future, I highly recommend using scripts/get_maintainers.pl. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022, Peter Gonda wrote: > > > > > > SEV-ES guests can request termination using the GHCB's MSR protocol. See > > > > > > AMD's GHCB spec section '4.1.13 Termination Request'. Currently when a > > > > > > guest does this the userspace VMM sees an KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN (-EVINAL) > > > > > > return code from KVM_RUN. By adding a KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN_ENTRY to kvm_run > > > > > > struct the userspace VMM can clearly see the guest has requested a SEV-ES > > > > > > termination including the termination reason code set and reason code. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Gonda <pgonda@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c > > > > > > index 75fa6dd268f0..5f9d37dd3f6f 100644 > > > > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c > > > > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c > > > > > > @@ -2735,8 +2735,13 @@ static int sev_handle_vmgexit_msr_protocol(struct vcpu_svm *svm) > > > > > > pr_info("SEV-ES guest requested termination: %#llx:%#llx\n", > > > > > > reason_set, reason_code); > > > > > > > > > > This pr_info() should be removed. A malicious usersepace could spam the kernel > > > > > by constantly running a vCPU that requests termination. > > > > > > Though... this patch makes this pr_info redundant! Since we'll now > > > report this in userspace. Actually, I'd be OK to remove it. > > > > I'll make this 2 patches. This current patch and another to rate limit > > this pr_info() I think this patch is doing a lot already so would > > prefer to just add a second. Is that reasonable? > > I strongly prefer removing the pr_info() entirely. As Marc pointed out, the > info is redundant when KVM properly reports the issue. And worse, the info is > useless unless there's exactly one VM running. Even then, it doesn't capture > which vCPU failed. This is exactly why Jim, myself, and others, have been pushing > to avoid using dmesg to report guest errors. They're helpful for initial > development, but dead weight for production, and if they're helpful for development > then odds are good that having proper reporting in production would also be valuable. Sounds good to me. Is a second patch OK with you? I think we get a lot of cryptic cpu run exit reasons so fixing this up when we remove pr_infos would be good. This would be a good example without this pr_info or this change you'd have no idea whats going on. > > > > > Quoting the spec: > > > > The reason code set is meant to provide hypervisors with their own > > > > termination SEV-ES Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block > > > > Standardization reason codes. This document defines and owns reason > > > > code set 0x0 and the following reason codes (GHCBData[23:16]): > > > > 0x00 – General termination request > > > > 0x01 – SEV-ES / GHCB Protocol range is not supported. > > > > 0x02 – SEV-SNP features not supported > > > > > > Reading this again, I now see that "reason_set" sounds like "The > > > reason code is set". I bet that's how Sean read it during his review. > > > So yeah, this needs comments :-)! > > > > I'll add comments but I agree with Marc. These are part of the GHCB > > spec so for the very specific SEV-ES termination reason we should > > include all the data the spec allows. Sounds OK? > > Ugh, so "set" means "set of reason codes"? That's heinous naming. I don't have a > strong objection to splitting, but at the same time, why not punt it to userspace? > Userspace is obviously going to have to understand what the hell "set" means > anyways... I am fine just copying the entire MSR to userspace.