Re: [PATCH] Add definitions for current cpu models..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 01:46:36AM -0500, john cooper wrote:
>> +    {
>> +        .name = "Opteron_G2",
>> +        .level = 5,
>> +        .vendor1 = CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_1,
>> +        .vendor2 = CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_2,
>> +        .vendor3 = CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_3,
> 
> Silly question: why a CPU named "Opteron_G2" uses intel vendor id's?

The feedback I had from AMD indicated using the Intel
strings for a family 15 cpu resulted in the least
amount of guest confusion.  The upstream kvm64 model
does similarly.

Sorry for my late response here which was preempted
by the intervening holiday.

-john

-- 
john.cooper@xxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux