On Wed, Mar 02, 2022, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> It makes more sense to print new SPTE value than the
> old value.
>
Fixes: d786c7783b01 ("KVM: MMU: inline set_spte in mmu_set_spte")
And arguably even Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, though that's unnecessary if this
gets into 5.17, which it should.
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 94f077722b290..0e209f0b2e1d2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -2690,8 +2690,8 @@ static int mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> if (*sptep == spte) {
> ret = RET_PF_SPURIOUS;
> } else {
> - trace_kvm_mmu_set_spte(level, gfn, sptep);
> flush |= mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
> + trace_kvm_mmu_set_spte(level, gfn, sptep);
> }
>
> if (wrprot) {
> --
> 2.26.3>
