On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 11:08 +0000, Alexandru Elisei wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 01:00:28PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 10:20 +0000, Alexandru Elisei wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 02:03:54PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2022-02-08 at 14:21 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > > > Those are few kvm unit tests tha I developed. > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Maxim Levitsky > > > > > > > > > > Maxim Levitsky (7): > > > > > pmu_lbr: few fixes > > > > > svm: Fix reg_corruption test, to avoid timer interrupt firing in later > > > > > tests. > > > > > svm: NMI is an "exception" and not interrupt in x86 land > > > > > svm: intercept shutdown in all svm tests by default > > > > > svm: add SVM_BARE_VMRUN > > > > > svm: add tests for LBR virtualization > > > > > svm: add tests for case when L1 intercepts various hardware interrupts > > > > > (an interrupt, SMI, NMI), but lets L2 control either EFLAG.IF or GIF > > > > > > > > > > lib/x86/processor.h | 1 + > > > > > x86/pmu_lbr.c | 6 + > > > > > x86/svm.c | 41 +--- > > > > > x86/svm.h | 63 ++++++- > > > > > x86/svm_tests.c | 447 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > > > x86/unittests.cfg | 3 +- > > > > > 6 files changed, 521 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.26.3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any update on these patches? > > > > > > It is possible that because you haven't sent the patches to the x86 > > > maintainer (as per the MAINTAINERS file), this series has gone unnoticed. > > > Also, each patch should start with "kvm-unit-tests PATCH" (have a look at > > > the README file), so people can easily tell them apart from KVM patches, > > > which go to the same mailing list. > > Do kvm-unit tests have MAINTAINERS file? Those patches are not for the kernel > > but for the kvm-unit test project. > > A simple ls should be sufficient [1] to answer that question. > > [1] https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/blob/master/MAINTAINERS I am blind. just that. I checked it and haven't seen the file. Now I see it of course. Best regards, Maixm Levitsky > > Thanks, > Alex > > > > You could try resending the entire series to the x86 mailing list and to > > > the relevant maintainers. To resend them, the convention is to modify the > > > subject prefix to "kvm-unit-tests PATCH RESEND" and send them without any > > > changes (though you can mention in the cover letter why you resent the > > > series). > > Thank you, I missed the prefix to be used! > > > > > Hope this helps! > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Alex > > > > Thanks! > > Best regards, > > Maxim Levitsky > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Maxim Levitsky > > > >
