Re: [PATCH 0/7] My set of KVM unit tests + fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 01:00:28PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 10:20 +0000, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 02:03:54PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2022-02-08 at 14:21 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > > Those are few kvm unit tests tha I developed.
> > > > 
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >     Maxim Levitsky
> > > > 
> > > > Maxim Levitsky (7):
> > > >   pmu_lbr: few fixes
> > > >   svm: Fix reg_corruption test, to avoid timer interrupt firing in later
> > > >     tests.
> > > >   svm: NMI is an "exception" and not interrupt in x86 land
> > > >   svm: intercept shutdown in all svm tests by default
> > > >   svm: add SVM_BARE_VMRUN
> > > >   svm: add tests for LBR virtualization
> > > >   svm: add tests for case when L1 intercepts various hardware interrupts
> > > >     (an interrupt, SMI, NMI), but lets L2 control either EFLAG.IF or GIF
> > > > 
> > > >  lib/x86/processor.h |   1 +
> > > >  x86/pmu_lbr.c       |   6 +
> > > >  x86/svm.c           |  41 +---
> > > >  x86/svm.h           |  63 ++++++-
> > > >  x86/svm_tests.c     | 447 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > >  x86/unittests.cfg   |   3 +-
> > > >  6 files changed, 521 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.26.3
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > Any update on these patches?
> > 
> > It is possible that because you haven't sent the patches to the x86
> > maintainer (as per the MAINTAINERS file), this series has gone unnoticed.
> > Also, each patch should start with "kvm-unit-tests PATCH" (have a look at
> > the README file), so people can easily tell them apart from KVM patches,
> > which go to the same mailing list.
> Do kvm-unit tests have MAINTAINERS file? Those patches are not for the kernel
> but for the kvm-unit test project.

A simple ls should be sufficient [1] to answer that question.

[1] https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/blob/master/MAINTAINERS

Thanks,
Alex

> 
> > 
> > You could try resending the entire series to the x86 mailing list and to
> > the relevant maintainers. To resend them, the convention is to modify the
> > subject prefix to "kvm-unit-tests PATCH RESEND" and send them without any
> > changes (though you can mention in the cover letter why you resent the
> > series).
> Thank you, I missed the prefix to be used!
> 
> > 
> > Hope this helps!
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Alex
> 
> Thanks!
> Best regards,
> 	Maxim Levitsky
> 
> > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > 	Maxim Levitsky
> > > 
> 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux