On 12/22/2009 10:01 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
new e1000 driver is more superior in architecture and do the required
work to make the new e1000 driver a full replacement for the old one.
Right, like everyone actually does things this way..
I wonder why do we have OSS, old Firewire and IDE stacks still around then?
And it's always a source of pain, isn't it.
I also personally don't see a big problem in having another set of
virtual drivers -- Linux already has plenty (vmware, xen, virtio, power,
s390-vm, ...) and it's not that they would be a particular maintenance
burden impacting the kernel core.
Exactly, I also don't see any problem here, especially since AlacrityVM
drivers have much cleaner design / internal architecture than some of their
competitors..
Care to provide some actual objective argument to why it's better than
what we already have?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
