> So far, the only actual technical advantage I've seen is that vbus avoids > EOI exits. The technical advantage is that it's significantly faster today. Maybe your proposed alternative is as fast, or maybe it's not. Who knows? > We think we understand why vbus does better than the current userspace > virtio backend. That's why we're building vhost-net. It's not done yet, > but our expectation is that it will do just as well if not better. That's the vapourware vs working code disconnect I mentioned. One side has hard numbers&working code and the other has expectations. I usually find it sad when the vapourware holds up the working code. -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
