On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 03:22:22PM -0800, Shirley Ma wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 22:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I dont insist, but my idea was
> >
> > for (;;) {
> > b = vq->destroy(vq);
> > if (!b)
> > break;
> > --vi->num;
> > put_page(b);
> > }
> >
> > so we do not have to lose track of the counter.
>
> That's not a bad idea, but to do this, then this fuction will be
> specific for virtio_net device (vi is virtnet_info) only in a generic
> virtqueue API.
>
> Thanks
> Shirley
No, this code would be in virtio net.
destroy would simply be the virtqueue API that returns
data pointer.
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
