Hello Michael, I agree with the comments (will have two patches instead of 4 based on Rusty's comments) except below one. On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 12:26 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > That said - do we have to use a callback? > I think destroy_buf which returns data pointer, > and which we call repeatedly until we get NULL > or error, would be an a better, more flexible API. > This is not critical though. The reason to use this is because in virtio_net remove, it has BUG_ON(vi->num != 0), which will be consistent with small skb packet. If we use NULL, error then we lose the track for vi->num, since we don't know how many buffers have been passed to ULPs or still unused. Thanks Shirley -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
