Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Dec 06, 2021, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> syzbot <syzbot+f1d2136db9c80d4733e8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > Hello, >> > >> > syzbot found the following issue on: >> > >> > HEAD commit: 5f58da2befa5 Merge tag 'drm-fixes-2021-12-03-1' of git://a.. >> > git tree: upstream >> > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=14927309b00000 >> > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=e9ea28d2c3c2c389 >> > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f1d2136db9c80d4733e8 >> > compiler: Debian clang version 11.0.1-2, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2 >> > >> > Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet. >> > >> > IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit: >> > Reported-by: syzbot+f1d2136db9c80d4733e8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> > ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 21158 at arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c:4548 nested_vmx_vmexit+0x16bd/0x17e0 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c:4547 >> > Modules linked in: >> > CPU: 0 PID: 21158 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc3-syzkaller #0 >> > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 >> > RIP: 0010:nested_vmx_vmexit+0x16bd/0x17e0 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c:4547 >> >> The comment above this WARN_ON_ONCE() says: >> >> 4541) /* >> 4542) * The only expected VM-instruction error is "VM entry with >> 4543) * invalid control field(s)." Anything else indicates a >> 4544) * problem with L0. And we should never get here with a >> 4545) * VMFail of any type if early consistency checks are enabled. >> 4546) */ >> 4547) WARN_ON_ONCE(vmcs_read32(VM_INSTRUCTION_ERROR) != >> 4548) VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_CONTROL_FIELD); >> >> which I think should still be valid and so the problem needs to be >> looked at L0 (GCE infrastructure). Sean, Jim, your call :-) > > The assertion itself is still valid, but look at the call stack. This is firing > when KVM tears down the VM, i.e. vmx->fail is likely stale. Oh, I see, true that! > I'll bet dollars to > donuts that commit c8607e4a086f ("KVM: x86: nVMX: don't fail nested VM entry on > invalid guest state if !from_vmentry") is to blame. L1 is running with > unrestricted_guest=Y, so the only way vmx->emulation_required should become true > is if L2 is active and is not an unrestricted guest. > > I objected to the patch[*], but looking back at the dates, it appears that I did > so after the patch was queued and my comments were never addressed. > I'll see if I can reproduce this with a selftest. The fix is likely just: > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > index dc4909b67c5c..927a7c43b73b 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > @@ -6665,10 +6665,6 @@ static fastpath_t vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > * consistency check VM-Exit due to invalid guest state and bail. > */ > if (unlikely(vmx->emulation_required)) { > - > - /* We don't emulate invalid state of a nested guest */ > - vmx->fail = is_guest_mode(vcpu); > - > vmx->exit_reason.full = EXIT_REASON_INVALID_STATE; > vmx->exit_reason.failed_vmentry = 1; > kvm_register_mark_available(vcpu, VCPU_EXREG_EXIT_INFO_1); > > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/YWDWPbgJik5spT1D@xxxxxxxxxx/ > Let's also summon Max to the discussion to get his thoughts. >> > <TASK> >> > vmx_leave_nested arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c:6220 [inline] >> > nested_vmx_free_vcpu+0x83/0xc0 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c:330 >> > vmx_free_vcpu+0x11f/0x2a0 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:6799 >> > kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy+0x6b/0x240 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:10989 >> > kvm_vcpu_destroy+0x29/0x90 arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:441 >> > kvm_free_vcpus arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11426 [inline] >> > kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x3ef/0x6b0 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11545 >> > kvm_destroy_vm arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:1189 [inline] >> > kvm_put_kvm+0x751/0xe40 arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:1220 >> > kvm_vcpu_release+0x53/0x60 arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:3489 >> > __fput+0x3fc/0x870 fs/file_table.c:280 >> > task_work_run+0x146/0x1c0 kernel/task_work.c:164 >> > exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:32 [inline] >> > do_exit+0x705/0x24f0 kernel/exit.c:832 >> > do_group_exit+0x168/0x2d0 kernel/exit.c:929 >> > get_signal+0x1740/0x2120 kernel/signal.c:2852 >> > arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x9c/0x730 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:868 >> > handle_signal_work kernel/entry/common.c:148 [inline] >> > exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:172 [inline] >> > exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x191/0x220 kernel/entry/common.c:207 >> > __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:289 [inline] >> > syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x2e/0x70 kernel/entry/common.c:300 >> > do_syscall_64+0x53/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86 >> > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae >> > RIP: 0033:0x7f3388806b19 >> > Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0x7f3388806aef. >> > RSP: 002b:00007f338773a218 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca >> > RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 00007f338891a0e8 RCX: 00007f3388806b19 >> > RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000080 RDI: 00007f338891a0e8 >> > RBP: 00007f338891a0e0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 >> > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f338891a0ec >> > R13: 00007fffbe0e838f R14: 00007f338773a300 R15: 0000000000022000 >> > </TASK> > -- Vitaly
