From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> In design, the guest virtuall address is only make sense for vcpu->arch.walk_mmu which is often the same as vcpu->arch.mmu. But they are different semantic by design, so vcpu->arch.walk_mmu should be used instead like other call site of kvm_mmu_invalidate_gva(). In theory, if L2's invlpg is being emulated by L0 (in practice, it hardly happen) when nTDP is used, ->tlb_flush_gva() should be called to flush hwTLB, but using vcpu->arch.mmu causes it incorrectly skept. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index f3aa91db4a7e..72ce0d78435e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -5353,7 +5353,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_invalidate_gva(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu, void kvm_mmu_invlpg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva) { - kvm_mmu_invalidate_gva(vcpu, vcpu->arch.mmu, gva, INVALID_PAGE); + kvm_mmu_invalidate_gva(vcpu, vcpu->arch.walk_mmu, gva, INVALID_PAGE); ++vcpu->stat.invlpg; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_mmu_invlpg); -- 2.19.1.6.gb485710b