On Thu, Nov 18, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 11/18/21 19:02, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > but that's not a great name because the former is used also when shadowing > > > EPT/NPT. I'm thinking of standardizing on "shadow" and "TDP" (it's not > > > perfect because of the 32-bit and tdp_mmu=0 cases, but it's a start). Maybe > > > even split parts of mmu.c out into shadow_mmu.c. > > But shadow is flat out wrong until EPT and NPT support is ripped out of the "legacy" > > MMU. > > Yeah, that's true. "full" MMU? :) Or we could just rip out non-nested TDP support from the legacy MMU and call it the shadow MMU :-)
