On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 07:18:03 +0000 Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > RC 0x100 is not an error but a notice that we could have gotten more > data from the Ultravisor if we had asked for it. So let's tolerate > them in our tests. > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > s390x/uv-guest.c | 4 ++-- > s390x/uv-host.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/s390x/uv-guest.c b/s390x/uv-guest.c > index f05ae4c3..e7446e03 100644 > --- a/s390x/uv-guest.c > +++ b/s390x/uv-guest.c > @@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ static void test_query(void) > report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_INV_LEN, "length"); > > uvcb.header.len = sizeof(uvcb); > - cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb); > - report(cc == 0 && uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_EXECUTED, "successful query"); > + uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb); > + report(uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_EXECUTED || uvcb.header.rc > == 0x100, "successful query"); if you want to be even more pedantic: report(cc == 0 && uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_EXECUTED || cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x100, ... > > /* > * These bits have been introduced with the very first > diff --git a/s390x/uv-host.c b/s390x/uv-host.c > index 28035707..66a11160 100644 > --- a/s390x/uv-host.c > +++ b/s390x/uv-host.c > @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static void test_query(void) > > uvcb_qui.header.len = sizeof(uvcb_qui); > uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb_qui); > - report(uvcb_qui.header.rc == UVC_RC_EXECUTED, "successful query"); > + report(uvcb_qui.header.rc == UVC_RC_EXECUTED || uvcb_qui.header.rc == 0x100, "successful query"); same here > > for (i = 0; cmds[i].name; i++) > report(uv_query_test_call(cmds[i].call_bit), "%s", cmds[i].name);
