RC 0x100 is not an error but a notice that we could have gotten more data from the Ultravisor if we had asked for it. So let's tolerate them in our tests. Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- s390x/uv-guest.c | 4 ++-- s390x/uv-host.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/s390x/uv-guest.c b/s390x/uv-guest.c index f05ae4c3..e7446e03 100644 --- a/s390x/uv-guest.c +++ b/s390x/uv-guest.c @@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ static void test_query(void) report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_INV_LEN, "length"); uvcb.header.len = sizeof(uvcb); - cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb); - report(cc == 0 && uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_EXECUTED, "successful query"); + uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb); + report(uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_EXECUTED || uvcb.header.rc == 0x100, "successful query"); /* * These bits have been introduced with the very first diff --git a/s390x/uv-host.c b/s390x/uv-host.c index 28035707..66a11160 100644 --- a/s390x/uv-host.c +++ b/s390x/uv-host.c @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static void test_query(void) uvcb_qui.header.len = sizeof(uvcb_qui); uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb_qui); - report(uvcb_qui.header.rc == UVC_RC_EXECUTED, "successful query"); + report(uvcb_qui.header.rc == UVC_RC_EXECUTED || uvcb_qui.header.rc == 0x100, "successful query"); for (i = 0; cmds[i].name; i++) report(uv_query_test_call(cmds[i].call_bit), "%s", cmds[i].name); -- 2.30.2
