Re: vhost-net patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 09:45:37AM -0700, Shirley Ma wrote:
> Hello Michael,
> 
> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 17:39 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Here's another hack to try. It will break raw sockets,
> > but just as a test:
> 
> This patch looks better than previous one for guest to host TCP_STREAM
> performance. The transmission queue full still exists, but TCP_STREAM
> results is 43xxMb/s (userspace is about 3500Mb/s). When I increase the
> transmission queue size to 1K,
> The performance burst up to 53xxMb/s. But
> some runs I still hit several transmission queue full in 60 secs run
> even with 1K queue size.

what exactly do you mean by transmission queue size?
tx_queue_len?
I think what should help with transmission queue full is
actually sndbuf parameter for tap in qemu.

> 
> Thanks
> Shirley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux