Re: nice value is ignored on cpu time accounting of a guest?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/19/2009 06:46 PM, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
Hi,

I have a question on cputime accounting of a guest. CPU time of a
guest is always
accounted as 'user' time of cpustat even if nice value of the guest is
higher than 0.
Is there a reason to do so? I think the cpu time of the guest should
be accounted
into 'nice' as same as a normal process. Am I wrong?

Hm, guest time is accounted separately, and added to user time in /proc (so tools that don't know about guest time can read it as user time).

Looks like we need to add a separate guest_nice, or get rid of guest time altogether.

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux