On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:59:41PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > > index af5696a96a76e0..4b0d60f7602e40 100644
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > > @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static struct vfio_pci_device *get_pf_vdev(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev,
> > > return NULL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - return vfio_device_data(*pf_dev);
> > > + return container_of(*pf_dev, struct vfio_pci_device, vdev);
> >
> > I think it would be useful to just return the vfio_device and let
> > the caller do the container_of() here, maybe as a followup.
>
> The callers seem to need the vfio_pci_device *?
Yes. But the container_of is trivial arithmetics, no need to waste
an indirect argument for that.
> In a later series this function gets transformed into this:
>
> device_lock(&physfn->dev);
> vdev = vfio_pci_get_drvdata(physfn);
> if (!vdev) {
> device_unlock(&physfn->dev);
> return NULL;
> }
> vfio_device_get(&vdev->vdev);
> device_unlock(&physfn->dev);
>
> There is no container_of here because the drvdata now points at the
> struct vfio_pci_device
Ok, so discard my comment then.
