On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 11:06:41AM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Glauber Costa wrote: > > > It ensures the two models are compatible. Since they're the same device > > > from the point of view of the guest, there's no reason for them to have > > > different representations or to be incompatible. > > > > live migration between something that has in-kernel irqchip and > > something that has not is likely to be a completely untested > > thing. And this is the only reason we might think of it as the same > > device. I don't see any value in supporting this combination > > Not just live migration. ACPI sleep + savevm + loadvm + ACPI resume, > for example. Yes, but in this case too, I'd expect the irqchipness of qemu not to change. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
