Glauber Costa wrote: > > It ensures the two models are compatible. Since they're the same device > > from the point of view of the guest, there's no reason for them to have > > different representations or to be incompatible. > > live migration between something that has in-kernel irqchip and > something that has not is likely to be a completely untested > thing. And this is the only reason we might think of it as the same > device. I don't see any value in supporting this combination Not just live migration. ACPI sleep + savevm + loadvm + ACPI resume, for example. -- Jamie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
