Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: x86/MMU: Do not check unsync status for root SP.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/02/21 18:01, Yu Zhang wrote:
In shadow page table, only leaf SPs may be marked as unsync;
instead, for non-leaf SPs, we store the number of unsynced
children in unsync_children. Therefore, in kvm_mmu_sync_root(),
sp->unsync shall always be zero for the root SP and there is
no need to check it. Remove the check, and add a warning
inside mmu_sync_children() to assert that the flags are used
properly.

While at it, move the warning from mmu_need_write_protect()
to kvm_unsync_page().

Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 12 +++++++++---
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 86af58294272..5f482af125b4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1995,6 +1995,12 @@ static void mmu_sync_children(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  	LIST_HEAD(invalid_list);
  	bool flush = false;
+ /*
+	 * Only 4k SPTEs can directly be made unsync, the parent pages
+	 * should never be unsyc'd.
+	 */
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(parent->unsync);
+
  	while (mmu_unsync_walk(parent, &pages)) {
  		bool protected = false;
@@ -2502,6 +2508,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_mmu_unprotect_page); static void kvm_unsync_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
  {
+	WARN_ON(sp->role.level != PG_LEVEL_4K);
+
  	trace_kvm_mmu_unsync_page(sp);
  	++vcpu->kvm->stat.mmu_unsync;
  	sp->unsync = 1;
@@ -2524,7 +2532,6 @@ bool mmu_need_write_protect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
  		if (sp->unsync)
  			continue;
- WARN_ON(sp->role.level != PG_LEVEL_4K);
  		kvm_unsync_page(vcpu, sp);
  	}
@@ -3406,8 +3413,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_sync_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  		 * mmu_need_write_protect() describe what could go wrong if this
  		 * requirement isn't satisfied.
  		 */
-		if (!smp_load_acquire(&sp->unsync) &&
-		    !smp_load_acquire(&sp->unsync_children))
+		if (!smp_load_acquire(&sp->unsync_children))
  			return;
write_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);


Queued, thanks.

Paolo




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux