On 1/20/21 3:48 PM, Kai Huang wrote: >> Not a big deal either way. I agree that "virt" can be confusing. >> >> Considering that: >> >> +config X86_SGX_VIRTUALIZATION >> + depends on ... KVM_INTEL > It is already in patch 3: Introduce virtual EPC for use by KVM guests: > > +config X86_SGX_VIRTUALIZATION > + bool "Software Guard eXtensions (SGX) Virtualization" > + depends on X86_SGX && KVM_INTEL Right, I'm suggesting that patch 3 should call it: X86_SGX_KVM instead of: X86_SGX_VIRTUALIZATION
