On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:51:44 -0800 Dave Hansen wrote: > On 1/20/21 3:48 PM, Kai Huang wrote: > >> Not a big deal either way. I agree that "virt" can be confusing. > >> > >> Considering that: > >> > >> +config X86_SGX_VIRTUALIZATION > >> + depends on ... KVM_INTEL > > It is already in patch 3: Introduce virtual EPC for use by KVM guests: > > > > +config X86_SGX_VIRTUALIZATION > > + bool "Software Guard eXtensions (SGX) Virtualization" > > + depends on X86_SGX && KVM_INTEL > > Right, I'm suggesting that patch 3 should call it: > > X86_SGX_KVM > > instead of: > > X86_SGX_VIRTUALIZATION In case we want to change to X86_SGX_KVM, is it more reasonable to put it to arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig (maybe change to X86_KVM_SGX)? Jarkko also mentioned X86_SGX_VEPC, in which case still putting it to arch/x86/Kconfig looks a better fit. Sean, Paolo, Do you have comment here?
