On 12/4/20 11:57 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:48:24 -0500
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/3/20 12:55 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 18:41:01 -0500
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The vfio_ap device driver registers a group notifier with VFIO when the
file descriptor for a VFIO mediated device for a KVM guest is opened to
receive notification that the KVM pointer is set (VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM
event). When the KVM pointer is set, the vfio_ap driver stashes the pointer
and calls the kvm_get_kvm() function to increment its reference counter.
When the notifier is called to make notification that the KVM pointer has
been set to NULL, the driver should clean up any resources associated with
the KVM pointer and decrement its reference counter. The current
implementation does not take care of this clean up.
Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Do we need a Fixes tag? Do we need this backported? In my opinion
this is necessary since the interrupt patches.
I'll put in a fixes tag:
Fixes: 258287c994de (s390: vfio-ap: implement mediated device open callback)
The canonical format would be
Fixes: 258287c994de ("s390: vfio-ap: implement mediated device open callback")
Okay.
Yes, this should probably be backported.
---
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
index e0bde8518745..eeb9c9130756 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
@@ -1083,6 +1083,17 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_iommu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
+static void vfio_ap_mdev_put_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
I don't like the name. The function does more that put_kvm. Maybe
something like _disconnect_kvm()?
Since the vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm() function is called by the
notifier when the KVM pointer is set, how about:
vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm()
for when the KVM pointer is nullified?
Sounds good to me.
