On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:48:24 -0500
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12/3/20 12:55 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 18:41:01 -0500
> > Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> The vfio_ap device driver registers a group notifier with VFIO when the
> >> file descriptor for a VFIO mediated device for a KVM guest is opened to
> >> receive notification that the KVM pointer is set (VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM
> >> event). When the KVM pointer is set, the vfio_ap driver stashes the pointer
> >> and calls the kvm_get_kvm() function to increment its reference counter.
> >> When the notifier is called to make notification that the KVM pointer has
> >> been set to NULL, the driver should clean up any resources associated with
> >> the KVM pointer and decrement its reference counter. The current
> >> implementation does not take care of this clean up.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Do we need a Fixes tag? Do we need this backported? In my opinion
> > this is necessary since the interrupt patches.
>
> I'll put in a fixes tag:
> Fixes: 258287c994de (s390: vfio-ap: implement mediated device open callback)
The canonical format would be
Fixes: 258287c994de ("s390: vfio-ap: implement mediated device open callback")
>
> Yes, this should probably be backported.
>
> >
> >> ---
> >> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
> >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> >> index e0bde8518745..eeb9c9130756 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> >> @@ -1083,6 +1083,17 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_iommu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> >> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static void vfio_ap_mdev_put_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
> > I don't like the name. The function does more that put_kvm. Maybe
> > something like _disconnect_kvm()?
> Since the vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm() function is called by the
> notifier when the KVM pointer is set, how about:
>
> vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm()
>
> for when the KVM pointer is nullified?
Sounds good to me.
