RE: [PATCH v6 14/15] vfio: Document dual stage control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Eric,

> From: Eric Auger <eric.auger.pro@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 3:41 PM
> 
> Hi Yi,
> 
> On 8/17/20 9:00 AM, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> >> From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2020 7:52 PM
> >>
> >> Hi Yi,
> >>
> >> On 7/28/20 8:27 AM, Liu Yi L wrote:
> >>> From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> The VFIO API was enhanced to support nested stage control: a bunch
> >>> of> new
> >> ioctls and usage guideline.
> >>>
> >>> Let's document the process to follow to set up nested mode.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> CC: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> v5 -> v6:
> >>> *) tweak per Eric's comments.
> >>>
> >>> v3 -> v4:
> >>> *) add review-by from Stefan Hajnoczi
> >>>
> >>> v2 -> v3:
> >>> *) address comments from Stefan Hajnoczi
> >>>
> >>> v1 -> v2:
> >>> *) new in v2, compared with Eric's original version, pasid table bind
> >>>    and fault reporting is removed as this series doesn't cover them.
> >>>    Original version from Eric.
> >>>    https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/20/700
> >>> ---
> >>>  Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst | 75
> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>  1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
> >>> b/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
> >>> index f1a4d3c..c0d43f0 100644
> >>> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
> >>> @@ -239,6 +239,81 @@ group and can access them as follows::
> >>>  	/* Gratuitous device reset and go... */
> >>>  	ioctl(device, VFIO_DEVICE_RESET);
> >>>
> >>> +IOMMU Dual Stage Control
> >>> +------------------------
> >>> +
> >>> +Some IOMMUs support 2 stages/levels of translation. Stage
> >>> +corresponds to the ARM terminology while level corresponds to Intel's
> terminology.
> >>> +In the following text we use either without distinction.
> >>> +
> >>> +This is useful when the guest is exposed with a virtual IOMMU and
> >>> +some devices are assigned to the guest through VFIO. Then the guest
> >>> +OS can use stage-1 (GIOVA -> GPA or GVA->GPA), while the hypervisor
> >>> +uses stage
> >>> +2 for VM isolation (GPA -> HPA).
> >>> +
> >>> +Under dual stage translation, the guest gets ownership of the
> >>> +stage-1 page tables and also owns stage-1 configuration structures.
> >>> +The hypervisor owns the root configuration structure (for security
> >>> +reason), including stage-2 configuration.
> >> This is only true for vtd. On ARM the stage2 cfg is the Context
> >> Descriptor table (aka PASID table). root cfg only store the GPA of
> >> the CD table.
> >
> > I've a check with you on the meaning of "configuration structures".
> > For Vt-d, does it mean the root table/context table/pasid table? if
> > I'm correct, then how about below description?
> Yes I agree

thanks.

> >
> > "Under dual stage translation, the guest gets ownership of the stage-1
> > configuration structures or page tables.
> Actually on ARM the guest both owns the S1 configuration (CD table) and
> S1 page tables ;-)

I see. so on ARM platform, guest owns both configuration and page table.

> on Intel I understand the guest only owns the S1 page tables.

yes, on Intel, guest only owns the S1 page tables.

> If confirmed, you may use such kind of explicit statement.

will do.

Regards,
Yi Liu

> Thanks
> 
> Eric
> 
>  This depends on vendor. The
> > hypervisor owns the root configuration structure (for security
> > reason), including stage-2 configuration."
> >
> >>  This works as long as configuration structures and page table
> >>> +formats are compatible between the virtual IOMMU and the physical IOMMU.
> >>> +
> >>> +Assuming the HW supports it, this nested mode is selected by
> >>> +choosing the VFIO_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU type through:
> >>> +
> >>> +    ioctl(container, VFIO_SET_IOMMU, VFIO_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU);
> >>> +
> >>> +This forces the hypervisor to use the stage-2, leaving stage-1
> >>> +available for guest usage. The stage-1 format and binding method
> >>> +are vendor specific
> >> . There are reported in the nesting capability ...
> >
> > got it.
> >
> > "The stage-1 format and binding method are reported in nesting capability."
> >
> >>> +and reported in nesting cap (VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_NESTING)
> >>> +through
> >>> +VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO:
> >>> +
> >>> +    ioctl(container->fd, VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO, &nesting_info);
> >>> +
> >>> +The nesting cap info is available only after NESTING_IOMMU is selected.
> >>> +If underlying IOMMU doesn't support nesting, VFIO_SET_IOMMU fails
> >>> +and
> >> If the underlying
> >
> > got it.
> >
> >>> +userspace should try other IOMMU types. Details of the nesting cap
> >>> +info can be found in Documentation/userspace-api/iommu.rst.
> >>> +
> >>> +The stage-1 page table can be bound to the IOMMU in two methods:
> >>> +directly>
> >> +or indirectly. Direct binding requires userspace to notify VFIO of
> >> +every
> >> Not sure we shall use this direct/indirect terminology. I don't think
> >> this is part of either ARM or Intel SPEC.
> >>
> >> Suggestion: On Intel, the stage1 page table info are mediated by the
> >> userspace for each PASID. On ARM, the userspace directly passes the
> >> GPA of the whole PASID table. Currently only Intel's binding is supported.
> >
> > got it. this is what we want to say by ditect/indirect terminology.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Yi Liu
> >
> >>> +guest stage-1 page table binding, while indirect binding allows
> >>> +userspace to bind once with an intermediate structure (e.g. PASID
> >>> +table) which indirectly links to guest stage-1 page tables. The
> >>> +actual binding method depends on IOMMU vendor. Currently only the
> >>> +direct binding capability (
> >>> +IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_BIND_PGTBL) is supported:
> >>> +
> >>> +    nesting_op->flags = VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP_BIND_PGTBL;
> >>> +    memcpy(&nesting_op->data, &bind_data, sizeof(bind_data));
> >>> +    ioctl(container->fd, VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP, nesting_op);
> >>> +
> >>> +When multiple stage-1 page tables are supported on a device, each
> >>> +page table is associated with a PASID (Process Address Space ID) to
> >>> +differentiate with each other. In such case, userspace should
> >>> +include PASID in the bind_data when issuing direct binding request.
> >>> +
> >>> +PASID could be managed per-device or system-wide which, again,
> >>> +depends on IOMMU vendor and is reported in nesting cap info. When
> >>> +system-wide policy is reported (IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_SYSWIDE_PASID),
> >>> +e.g. as by Intel platforms, userspace *must* allocate PASID from
> >>> +VFIO before attempting binding of
> >>> +stage-1 page table:
> >>> +
> >>> +    req.flags = VFIO_IOMMU_ALLOC_PASID;
> >>> +    ioctl(container, VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST, &req);
> >>> +
> >>> +Once the stage-1 page table is bound to the IOMMU, the guest is
> >>> +allowed to fully manage its mapping at its disposal. The IOMMU
> >>> +walks nested stage-1 and stage-2 page tables when serving DMA
> >>> +requests from assigned device, and may cache the stage-1 mapping in
> >>> +the IOTLB. When required (IOMMU_NESTING_ FEAT_CACHE_INVLD),
> >>> +userspace *must* forward guest stage-1 invalidation to the host, so the IOTLB
> is invalidated:
> >>> +
> >>> +    nesting_op->flags = VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP_CACHE_INVLD;
> >>> +    memcpy(&nesting_op->data, &cache_inv_data, sizeof(cache_inv_data));
> >>> +    ioctl(container->fd, VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP, nesting_op);
> >>> +
> >>> +Forwarded invalidations can happen at various granularity levels
> >>> +(page level, context level, etc.)
> >>> +
> >>>  VFIO User API
> >>>
> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> -----------
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Eric
> >




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux