Hi Eric, > From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2020 7:52 PM > > Hi Yi, > > On 7/28/20 8:27 AM, Liu Yi L wrote: > > From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The VFIO API was enhanced to support nested stage control: a bunch of> new > ioctls and usage guideline. > > > > Let's document the process to follow to set up nested mode. > > > > Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> > > CC: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v5 -> v6: > > *) tweak per Eric's comments. > > > > v3 -> v4: > > *) add review-by from Stefan Hajnoczi > > > > v2 -> v3: > > *) address comments from Stefan Hajnoczi > > > > v1 -> v2: > > *) new in v2, compared with Eric's original version, pasid table bind > > and fault reporting is removed as this series doesn't cover them. > > Original version from Eric. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/20/700 > > --- > > Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst | 75 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst > > index f1a4d3c..c0d43f0 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst > > @@ -239,6 +239,81 @@ group and can access them as follows:: > > /* Gratuitous device reset and go... */ > > ioctl(device, VFIO_DEVICE_RESET); > > > > +IOMMU Dual Stage Control > > +------------------------ > > + > > +Some IOMMUs support 2 stages/levels of translation. Stage corresponds > > +to the ARM terminology while level corresponds to Intel's terminology. > > +In the following text we use either without distinction. > > + > > +This is useful when the guest is exposed with a virtual IOMMU and some > > +devices are assigned to the guest through VFIO. Then the guest OS can > > +use stage-1 (GIOVA -> GPA or GVA->GPA), while the hypervisor uses stage > > +2 for VM isolation (GPA -> HPA). > > + > > +Under dual stage translation, the guest gets ownership of the stage-1 page > > +tables and also owns stage-1 configuration structures. The hypervisor owns > > +the root configuration structure (for security reason), including stage-2 > > +configuration. > This is only true for vtd. On ARM the stage2 cfg is the Context > Descriptor table (aka PASID table). root cfg only store the GPA of the > CD table. I've a check with you on the meaning of "configuration structures". For Vt-d, does it mean the root table/context table/pasid table? if I'm correct, then how about below description? "Under dual stage translation, the guest gets ownership of the stage-1 configuration structures or page tables. This depends on vendor. The hypervisor owns the root configuration structure (for security reason), including stage-2 configuration." > This works as long as configuration structures and page table > > +formats are compatible between the virtual IOMMU and the physical IOMMU. > > + > > +Assuming the HW supports it, this nested mode is selected by choosing the > > +VFIO_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU type through: > > + > > + ioctl(container, VFIO_SET_IOMMU, VFIO_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU); > > + > > +This forces the hypervisor to use the stage-2, leaving stage-1 available > > +for guest usage. The stage-1 format and binding method are vendor specific > . There are reported in the nesting capability ... got it. "The stage-1 format and binding method are reported in nesting capability." > > +and reported in nesting cap (VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_NESTING) through > > +VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO: > > + > > + ioctl(container->fd, VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO, &nesting_info); > > + > > +The nesting cap info is available only after NESTING_IOMMU is selected. > > +If underlying IOMMU doesn't support nesting, VFIO_SET_IOMMU fails and > If the underlying got it. > > +userspace should try other IOMMU types. Details of the nesting cap info > > +can be found in Documentation/userspace-api/iommu.rst. > > + > > +The stage-1 page table can be bound to the IOMMU in two methods: directly> > +or indirectly. Direct binding requires userspace to notify VFIO of every > Not sure we shall use this direct/indirect terminology. I don't think > this is part of either ARM or Intel SPEC. > > Suggestion: On Intel, the stage1 page table info are mediated by the > userspace for each PASID. On ARM, the userspace directly passes the GPA > of the whole PASID table. Currently only Intel's binding is supported. got it. this is what we want to say by ditect/indirect terminology. Regards, Yi Liu > > +guest stage-1 page table binding, while indirect binding allows userspace > > +to bind once with an intermediate structure (e.g. PASID table) which > > +indirectly links to guest stage-1 page tables. The actual binding method > > +depends on IOMMU vendor. Currently only the direct binding capability ( > > +IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_BIND_PGTBL) is supported: > > + > > + nesting_op->flags = VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP_BIND_PGTBL; > > + memcpy(&nesting_op->data, &bind_data, sizeof(bind_data)); > > + ioctl(container->fd, VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP, nesting_op); > > + > > +When multiple stage-1 page tables are supported on a device, each page > > +table is associated with a PASID (Process Address Space ID) to differentiate > > +with each other. In such case, userspace should include PASID in the > > +bind_data when issuing direct binding request. > > + > > +PASID could be managed per-device or system-wide which, again, depends on > > +IOMMU vendor and is reported in nesting cap info. When system-wide policy > > +is reported (IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_SYSWIDE_PASID), e.g. as by Intel platforms, > > +userspace *must* allocate PASID from VFIO before attempting binding of > > +stage-1 page table: > > + > > + req.flags = VFIO_IOMMU_ALLOC_PASID; > > + ioctl(container, VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST, &req); > > + > > +Once the stage-1 page table is bound to the IOMMU, the guest is allowed to > > +fully manage its mapping at its disposal. The IOMMU walks nested stage-1 > > +and stage-2 page tables when serving DMA requests from assigned device, and > > +may cache the stage-1 mapping in the IOTLB. When required (IOMMU_NESTING_ > > +FEAT_CACHE_INVLD), userspace *must* forward guest stage-1 invalidation to > > +the host, so the IOTLB is invalidated: > > + > > + nesting_op->flags = VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP_CACHE_INVLD; > > + memcpy(&nesting_op->data, &cache_inv_data, sizeof(cache_inv_data)); > > + ioctl(container->fd, VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP, nesting_op); > > + > > +Forwarded invalidations can happen at various granularity levels (page > > +level, context level, etc.) > > + > > VFIO User API > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Thanks > > Eric