On 10/07/20 20:33, Nadav Amit wrote: > These patches are intended to allow the svm tests to run on bare-metal. > The second patch indicates there is a bug in KVM. > > Unfortunately, two tests still fail on bare-metal for reasons that I > could not figure out, with my somewhat limited SVM knowledge. > > The first failure is "direct NMI while running guest". For some reason > the NMI is not delivered. Note that "direct NMI + hlt" and others pass. > > The second is npt_rw_pfwalk_check. Even after the relevant fixes, > exit_info_2 has a mismatch, when the expected value (of the faulting > guest physical address) is 0x641000 and the actual is 0x641208. It might > be related to the fact that the physical server has more memory, but I > could not reproduce it on a VM with more physical memory. Could be much worse---and could be bugs in KVM too, though we're definitely faring better than six months ago. Thanks, queued patches 2-4 and sent a replacement for patch 1. Paolo
