Re: [PATCH 0/2] eventfd: new EFD_STATE flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/26/2009 10:13 PM, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Ok, so why not using the eventfd counter as state?
On the device side:

void write_state(int sfd, int state) {
	u64 cnt;

	/* Clear the current state, sfd is in non-blocking mode */
	read(sfd,&cnt, sizeof(cnt));
	/* Writes new state */
	cnt = 1 + !!state;
	write(sfd,&cnt, sizeof(cnt));
}


On the hypervisor side:

int read_state(int sfd) {
	u64 cnt;

	read(sfd,&cnt, sizeof(cnt));
	return state - 1;
}


Hadn't though of read+write as set. While the 1+ is a little ugly, it's workable.

I see no kernel equivalent to read(), but that's easily done.

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux