On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Yes, we don't want that. The best thing is to try to restate the problem > in a way that is generic, and then either solve or best use existing > solution. Right? > > I thought I had that, but apparently not. The reason I'm Cc-ing you is > not to try and spam you until you give up and accept the patch, it's > hoping that you see the pattern behind our usage, and help generalize > it. > > If I understand it correctly, you believe this is not possible and so > any solution will have to be in KVM? Or maybe I didn't state the problem > clearly enough and should restate it? Please do. - Davide -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
