суб, 16. мај 2020. у 13:55 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> је написао/ла: > > On 16/05/20 11:36, Huacai Chen wrote: > >> I'm happy to see you taking care of the KVM part. So how is your plan > >> to handle patches ? Do want to collect them and send pull requests to > >> me ? Or should I just pick them up with your Acked-by ? > > I think we can only use the second method, because both Aleksandar and > > me don't have a kernel tree in kernel.org now. > > If you don't mind, I generally prefer to have MIPS changs submitted > through the KVM tree, because KVM patches rarely have intrusive changes > in generic arch files. It's more common to have generic KVM patches > that require touching all architectures. > To me, Paolo's workflow seems reasonable and efficient from practical point of view. No unnecessary multitude of repeated series or pull sending, and no single person is burdened with majority of work being done just by himself for any given case of series like this one. Also, it looks to me it is quite efficient wrt possible conflict and rebase issues, that will be taken care by both KVM/MIPS and KVM/general submitters/maintainers. I suggest we keep Paolo's workflow plan for this series, but, more importantly, if you guys all agree, in future as well. Sincerely, Aleksandar > For 5.8 I don't have anything planned that could cause conflicts, so > this time it doesn't matter; but I can pick these up too if Thomas acks > patches 6, 12 and 14. > > Thanks, > > Paolo >
