On 16/05/20 11:36, Huacai Chen wrote: >> I'm happy to see you taking care of the KVM part. So how is your plan >> to handle patches ? Do want to collect them and send pull requests to >> me ? Or should I just pick them up with your Acked-by ? > I think we can only use the second method, because both Aleksandar and > me don't have a kernel tree in kernel.org now. If you don't mind, I generally prefer to have MIPS changs submitted through the KVM tree, because KVM patches rarely have intrusive changes in generic arch files. It's more common to have generic KVM patches that require touching all architectures. For 5.8 I don't have anything planned that could cause conflicts, so this time it doesn't matter; but I can pick these up too if Thomas acks patches 6, 12 and 14. Thanks, Paolo
