This is a rewrite of this[1] Wiki page with further enhancements. The doc also includes a section on debugging problems in nested environments, among other improvements. [1] https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Nested_Guests Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@xxxxxxxxxx> --- - In v3: - Address feedback from Paolo and Cornelia from v2: https://marc.info/?t=158738155500003&r=1&w=2 - In v2: - Address Cornelia's feedback v1: https://marc.info/?l=kvm&m=158109042605606&w=2 - Address Dave's feedback from v1: https://marc.info/?l=kvm&m=158109134905930&w=2 - v1 is here: https://marc.info/?l=kvm&m=158108941605311&w=2 --- .../virt/kvm/running-nested-guests.rst | 287 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 287 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/virt/kvm/running-nested-guests.rst diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/running-nested-guests.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/running-nested-guests.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..72b5a9bc7b456c28ea5c45f2289ff4ba0211db6f --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/running-nested-guests.rst @@ -0,0 +1,287 @@ +============================== +Running nested guests with KVM +============================== + +A nested guest is the ability to run a guest inside another guest (it +can be KVM-based or a different hypervisor). The straightforward +example is a KVM guest that in turn runs on a KVM guest (the rest of +this document is built on this example):: + + .----------------. .----------------. + | | | | + | L2 | | L2 | + | (Nested Guest) | | (Nested Guest) | + | | | | + |----------------'--'----------------| + | | + | L1 (Guest Hypervisor) | + | KVM (/dev/kvm) | + | | + .------------------------------------------------------. + | L0 (Host Hypervisor) | + | KVM (/dev/kvm) | + |------------------------------------------------------| + | Hardware (with virtualization extensions) | + '------------------------------------------------------' + +Terminology: + +- L0 – level-0; the bare metal host, running KVM + +- L1 – level-1 guest; a VM running on L0; also called the "guest + hypervisor", as it itself is capable of running KVM. + +- L2 – level-2 guest; a VM running on L1, this is the "nested guest" + +.. note:: The above diagram is modelled after the x86 architecture; + s390x, ppc64 and other architectures are likely to have + a different design for nesting. + + For example, s390x always has an LPAR (LogicalPARtition) + hypervisor running on bare metal, adding another layer and + resulting in at least four levels in a nested setup — L0 (bare + metal, running the LPAR hypervisor), L1 (host hypervisor), L2 + (guest hypervisor), L3 (nested guest). + + This document will stick with the three-level terminology (L0, + L1, and L2) for all architectures; and will largely focus on + x86. + + +Use Cases +--------- + +There are several scenarios where nested KVM can be useful, to name a +few: + +- As a developer, you want to test your software on different operating + systems (OSes). Instead of renting multiple VMs from a Cloud + Provider, using nested KVM lets you rent a large enough "guest + hypervisor" (level-1 guest). This in turn allows you to create + multiple nested guests (level-2 guests), running different OSes, on + which you can develop and test your software. + +- Live migration of "guest hypervisors" and their nested guests, for + load balancing, disaster recovery, etc. + +- VM image creation tools (e.g. ``virt-install``, etc) often run + their own VM, and users expect these to work inside a VM. + +- Some OSes use virtualization internally for security (e.g. to let + applications run safely in isolation). + + +Enabling "nested" (x86) +----------------------- + +From Linux kernel v4.19 onwards, the ``nested`` KVM parameter is enabled +by default for Intel and AMD. (Though your Linux distribution might +override this default.) + +In case you are running a Linux kernel older than v4.19, to enable +nesting, set the ``nested`` KVM module parameter to ``Y`` or ``1``. To +persist this setting across reboots, you can add it in a config file, as +shown below: + +1. On the bare metal host (L0), list the kernel modules and ensure that + the KVM modules:: + + $ lsmod | grep -i kvm + kvm_intel 133627 0 + kvm 435079 1 kvm_intel + +2. Show information for ``kvm_intel`` module:: + + $ modinfo kvm_intel | grep -i nested + parm: nested:boolkvm 435079 1 kvm_intel + +3. For the nested KVM configuration to persist across reboots, place the + below in ``/etc/modprobed/kvm_intel.conf`` (create the file if it + doesn't exist):: + + $ cat /etc/modprobe.d/kvm_intel.conf + options kvm-intel nested=y + +4. Unload and re-load the KVM Intel module:: + + $ sudo rmmod kvm-intel + $ sudo modprobe kvm-intel + +5. Verify if the ``nested`` parameter for KVM is enabled:: + + $ cat /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/nested + Y + +For AMD hosts, the process is the same as above, except that the module +name is ``kvm-amd``. + + +Additional nested-related kernel parameters (x86) +------------------------------------------------- + +If your hardware is sufficiently advanced (Intel Haswell processor or +higher, which has newer hardware virt extensions), the following +additional features will also be enabled by default: "Shadow VMCS +(Virtual Machine Control Structure)", APIC Virtualization on your bare +metal host (L0). Parameters for Intel hosts:: + + $ cat /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/enable_shadow_vmcs + Y + + $ cat /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/enable_apicv + Y + + $ cat /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/ept + Y + +.. note:: If you suspect your L2 (i.e. nested guest) is running slower, + ensure the above are enabled (particularly + ``enable_shadow_vmcs`` and ``ept``). + + +Starting a nested guest (x86) +----------------------------- + +Once your bare metal host (L0) is configured for nesting, you should be +able to start an L1 guest with:: + + $ qemu-kvm -cpu host [...] + +The above will pass through the host CPU's capabilities as-is to the +gues); or for better live migration compatibility, use a named CPU +model supported by QEMU. e.g.:: + + $ qemu-kvm -cpu Haswell-noTSX-IBRS,vmx=on + +then the guest hypervisor will subsequently be capable of running a +nested guest with accelerated KVM. + + +Enabling "nested" (s390x) +------------------------- + +1. On the host hypervisor (L0), enable the ``nested`` parameter on + s390x:: + + $ rmmod kvm + $ modprobe kvm nested=1 + +.. note:: On s390x, the kernel parameter ``hpage`` is mutually exclusive + with the ``nested`` paramter — i.e. to be able to enable + ``nested``, the ``hpage`` parameter *must* be disabled. + +2. The guest hypervisor (L1) must be provided with the ``sie`` CPU + feature — with QEMU, this can be done by using "host passthrough" + (via the command-line ``-cpu host``). + +3. Now the KVM module can be loaded in the L1 (guest hypervisor):: + + $ modprobe kvm + + +Live migration with nested KVM +------------------------------ + +The below live migration scenarios should work as of Linux kernel 5.3 +and QEMU 4.2.0 for x86; for s390x, even older versions might work. +In all the below cases, L1 exposes ``/dev/kvm`` in it, i.e. the L2 guest +is a "KVM-accelerated guest", not a "plain emulated guest" (as done by +QEMU's TCG). + +- Migrating a nested guest (L2) to another L1 guest on the *same* bare + metal host. + +- Migrating a nested guest (L2) to another L1 guest on a *different* + bare metal host. + +- Migrating an L1 guest, with an *offline* nested guest in it, to + another bare metal host. + +- Migrating an L1 guest, with a *live* nested guest in it, to another + bare metal host. + +Limitations on Linux kernel versions older than 5.3 (x86) +--------------------------------------------------------- + +On Linux kernel versions older than 5.3, once an L1 guest has started an +L2 guest, the L1 guest would no longer capable of being migrated, saved, +or loaded (refer to QEMU documentation on "save"/"load") until the L2 +guest shuts down. + +Attempting to migrate or save-and-load an L1 guest while an L2 guest is +running will result in undefined behavior. You might see a ``kernel +BUG!`` entry in ``dmesg``, a kernel 'oops', or an outright kernel panic. +Such a migrated or loaded L1 guest can no longer be considered stable or +secure, and must be restarted. + +Migrating an L1 guest merely configured to support nesting, while not +actually running L2 guests, is expected to function normally. +Live-migrating an L2 guest from one L1 guest to another is also expected +to succeed. + +Reporting bugs from nested setups +----------------------------------- + +Debugging "nested" problems can involve sifting through log files across +L0, L1 and L2; this can result in tedious back-n-forth between the bug +reporter and the bug fixer. + +- Mention that you are in a "nested" setup. If you are running any kind + of "nesting" at all, say so. Unfortunately, this needs to be called + out because when reporting bugs, people tend to forget to even + *mention* that they're using nested virtualization. + +- Ensure you are actually running KVM on KVM. Sometimes people do not + have KVM enabled for their guest hypervisor (L1), which results in + them running with pure emulation or what QEMU calls it as "TCG", but + they think they're running nested KVM. Thus confusing "nested Virt" + (which could also mean, QEMU on KVM) with "nested KVM" (KVM on KVM). + +Information to collect (generic) +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +The following is not an exhaustive list, but a very good starting point: + + - Kernel, libvirt, and QEMU version from L0 + + - Kernel, libvirt and QEMU version from L1 + + - QEMU command-line of L1 -- when using libvirt, you'll find it here: + ``/var/log/libvirt/qemu/instance.log`` + + - QEMU command-line of L2 -- as above, when using libvirt, get the + complete libvirt-generated QEMU command-line + + - ``cat /sys/cpuinfo`` from L0 + + - ``cat /sys/cpuinfo`` from L1 + + - ``lscpu`` from L0 + + - ``lscpu`` from L1 + + - Full ``dmesg`` output from L0 + + - Full ``dmesg`` output from L1 + +x86-specific info to collect +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Both the below commands, ``x86info`` and ``dmidecode``, should be +available on most Linux distributions with the same name: + + - Output of: ``x86info -a`` from L0 + + - Output of: ``x86info -a`` from L1 + + - Output of: ``dmidecode`` from L0 + + - Output of: ``dmidecode`` from L1 + +s390x-specific info to collect +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Along with the earlier mentioned generic details, the below is +also recommended: + + - ``/proc/sysinfo`` from L1; this will also include the info from L0 -- 2.21.1
