Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] vbus: add a "vbus-proxy" bus model for vbus_driver objects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/19/2009 09:40 AM, Gregory Haskins wrote:

So if I whip up a virtio-net backend for vbus with a PCI compliant
connector, you are happy?

This doesn't improve virtio-net in any way.
Any why not?  (Did you notice I said "PCI compliant", i.e. over virtio-pci)

Because virtio-net will have gained nothing that it didn't have before.




virtio already supports this model; see lguest and s390.  Transporting
virtio over vbus and vbus over something else doesn't gain anything over
directly transporting virtio over that something else.
This is not what I am advocating.


What are you advocating? As far as I can tell your virtio-vbus connector plus the vbus-kvm connector is just that.

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux