On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 18:29, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 23/04/20 11:56, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >> Please re-evaluate if this is needed (or which parts are needed) after
> >> cleaning up patch 4. Anyway again---this is already better, I don't
> >> like the duplicated code but at least I can understand what's going on.
> > Except the apic_lvtt_tscdeadline(apic) check, others are duplicated,
> > what do you think about apic_lvtt_tscdeadline(apic) check?
>
> We have to take a look again after you clean up patch 4. My hope is to
> reuse the slowpath code as much as possible, by introducing some
> optimizations here and there.
I found we are not need to move the if (vcpu->arch.apicv_active) from
__apic_accept_irq() to a separate function if I understand you
correctly. Please see patch v3 3/5. In addition, I observe
kvm-unit-tests #UD etc if check need_cancel_enter_guest() after the
generic fastpath handler, I didn't dig too much, just move it before
the generic fastpath handler for safe in patch v3 2/5.
Wanpeng
