On 04/09/20 at 01:14pm, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > While I would suggest adding kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx when code changes > > are related to kexec/kdump since we usually watch this mailing list. > > LKML contains too many mails, we may miss this kind of change, have to > > debug and test again. > > > > Definitely makes sense and I'll try my best to remember doing this > myself next time but the problem is that scripts/checkpatch.pl is not > smart enough, kexec related bits are scattered all over kernel and > drivers so I'm afraid you're missing a lot in kexec@ :-( Yeah, understand, thanks.
