Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > While I would suggest adding kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx when code changes > are related to kexec/kdump since we usually watch this mailing list. > LKML contains too many mails, we may miss this kind of change, have to > debug and test again. > Definitely makes sense and I'll try my best to remember doing this myself next time but the problem is that scripts/checkpatch.pl is not smart enough, kexec related bits are scattered all over kernel and drivers so I'm afraid you're missing a lot in kexec@ :-( -- Vitaly
