Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: x86: CPUID emulation and tracing fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/03/20 18:12, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> In theory, everything up to the refactoring is non-controversial, i.e. we
>>> can bikeshed the refactoring without delaying the bug fixes.
>> Even the refactoring itself is much less controversial.  I queued
>> everything, there's always time to unqueue.
> Looks like the build-time assertions don't play nice with older versions of
> gcc :-(

Yes, I was quite surprised that they worked.  I suppose you could write
a macro that checks against 'G', 'e', 'n', 'u', 'i', 'n', 'e', 'I', 'n',
't', 'e', 'l'...

Paolo




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux