On 28/02/20 01:36, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Regarding NRIPS, the original commit added the "Support next_rip if host > supports it" comment, but I can't tell is "host supports" means "supported > in hardware" or "supported by KVM". In other words, should I make the cap > dependent "nrips" or leave it as is? > The "nrips" parameter came later. For VMX we generally remove guest capabilities if the corresponding parameter is on, so it's a good idea to do the same for SVM. Paolo
