On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 01:00:59PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 07/02/20 18:37, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > Rename kvm_mmu->get_cr3() to call out that it is retrieving a guest > > value, as opposed to kvm_mmu->set_cr3(), which sets a host value, and to > > note that it will return L1's EPTP when nested EPT is in use. Hopefully > > the new name will also make it more obvious that L1's nested_cr3 is > > returned in SVM's nested NPT case. > > > > No functional change intended. > > Should we call it "get_pgd", since that is how Linux calls the top-level > directory? I always get confused by PUD/PMD, but as long as we only > keep one /p.d/ moniker it should be fine. Heh, I have the exact same sentiment. get_pgd() works for me.